Skip to main content
SizeVS

Galaxy M17e vs Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

Side-by-side comparison with real-scale visuals and detailed specifications

100% Objective Comparisons — Data sourced from official manufacturers
See our methodology
Advertisement
Ad Space
100%
Galaxy M17e is 3.0% taller
Galaxy M17e
167.4mm×77.4mm
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
162.6mm×75.6mm
Scaled to real proportions

Specifications Comparison

A

Galaxy M17e

Samsung

5 wins
B

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

Xiaomi

3 wins
📱

Screen Size

Galaxy M17e

6.7"

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

6.67"

Difference: 0.03" (0.4% more)
🔋

Battery

Galaxy M17e

6,000mAh

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

5,000mAh

Difference: 1,000mAh (20.0% more)
💾

RAM

Galaxy M17e

4GB

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

12GB

Difference: 8GB (200.0% more)
âš–ī¸

Weight

Galaxy M17e

199g

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

204g

Difference: 5g (2.5% less)
đŸ’ŋ

Storage

Galaxy M17e

128GB

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

256GB

Difference: 128GB (100.0% more)
📷

Main Camera

Galaxy M17e

50MP

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

200MP

Difference: 150MP (300.0% more)
💰

Price

Galaxy M17e

250$

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

650$

Difference: 400$ (160.0% less)
📏

Height

Galaxy M17e

167.4mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

162.6mm

📐

Width

Galaxy M17e

77.4mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

75.6mm

đŸ“Ļ

Thickness

Galaxy M17e

8.2mm

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)

8.9mm

Difference: 0.7mm (8.5% less)
Galaxy M17e
Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
Winner in category
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: gsmarena.com
Last updated: March 23, 2026
Source: Official Source
Advertisement
Ad Space

Why Trust Our Comparisons

Verified Data

All specs verified from official sources

No Affiliate Bias

We don't earn from product sales

Regularly Updated

Data refreshed when specs change

Transparent Method

Our comparison methodology is public

SE

SizeVS Editorial Team

Verified

Product Comparison Specialists

Our team of tech enthusiasts and data analysts work to provide accurate, unbiased product comparisons.

Verified Data Sources Editorial Standards
Updated:
Our methodology

Explore this matchup

More related comparisons